FREE TOOL

Is your site ready to be cited by AI?

AI answer engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google's AI overviews — now sit between your content and your audience. This free checker scores how ready a page is to be read, trusted, and quoted by them, and tells you what to fix.

Free instant score — no signup. Powered by the live /v1/aeo/citation-readiness audit; get the full breakdown and fixes with your 1,000 free credits.

What the checker scores

Citation-readiness is not one number you can fake — it's a handful of concrete signals an answer engine uses to decide whether your page is worth reading and safe to quote. The audit grades each one and returns a breakdown, not just a grade:

  • Answerable structure. Clear question-style headings with direct, self-contained answers an engine can lift verbatim.
  • Structured data. JSON-LD / schema.org markup (Article, FAQPage, HowTo, Organization) that tells engines what the page is.
  • Crawlability for AI. robots.txt, llms.txt, and meta directives that actually allow the AI crawlers you want citing you.
  • Entity clarity. Unambiguous names, definitions, and 'what is' statements that pin down the entities on the page.
  • Freshness signals. Visible and structured dates, last-updated markers, and changelog cues engines use to trust currency.
  • Extractable facts. Numbers, lists, and tables in clean markup — the shapes models quote most reliably.
  • Source authority. Author, citations, and outbound references that raise the page's trust for answer engines.
  • Render without JS. Whether the substance is in the HTML or trapped behind JavaScript an engine may never run.

Why citation-readiness matters now

Search is shifting from ten blue links to one synthesized answer. When an AI engine answers a question, it reads a small set of sources and cites a few — and being one of those cited sources is the new front page. A beautifully ranked page that an engine can't cleanly parse, can't verify, or isn't allowed to crawl simply doesn't get quoted. Citation-readiness is how you measure whether you're in that set.

How the score is produced

When you run the audit, Ollagraph fetches the page the way an answer engine would — rendering JavaScript when needed — then inspects its structure, schema markup, crawl directives, entities, and extractable facts, and returns a scored breakdown with specific findings. It's the same /v1/aeo/citation-readiness endpoint our customers run in production and in CI; this page is just the friendly front door to it.

How to improve a weak score

  • Answer the question in the first sentence under each heading — engines lift self-contained answers, not buried ones.
  • Add the right schemaFAQPage, HowTo, Article — so engines know what the page is.
  • Ship an llms.txt and a clean robots.txt that allow the AI crawlers you want citing you.
  • Put facts in markup, not images — numbers, lists, and tables in HTML are what models quote.
  • Render the substance server-side so content isn't trapped behind JavaScript an engine may not run.

Want the full playbook? Read AEO vs SEO in 2026 and the AEO audits overview.

How answer engines decide — primary sources

These signals aren't folklore; they track the public standards and research that answer engines build on. The references this checker leans on:

Common questions

What is AI citation-readiness?

It's how likely an AI answer engine — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google's AI overviews — is to read your page, trust it, and cite it in an answer. It depends on structure, schema markup, crawlability for AI bots, clear entities, freshness, and whether your content is extractable without running JavaScript.

Is this checker really free?

Yes. Enter a URL and run the full audit on your 1,000 free credits — no card required. The audit is powered by Ollagraph's live /v1/aeo/citation-readiness endpoint, the same one teams call in production.

How is citation-readiness different from SEO?

SEO optimizes for ranking in a list of blue links; AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) optimizes for being the source an AI quotes in its answer. They overlap on crawlability and quality, but AEO weighs extractable structure, schema, clear answers, and entity clarity far more heavily. See our AEO vs SEO guide.

Which AI crawlers does it check for?

The audit inspects robots.txt, llms.txt, and meta rules for the major answer-engine and AI-training crawlers, and flags where you're unintentionally blocking the ones you'd want citing you.

Does running the checker store my page content?

No. Ollagraph returns your audit result and keeps only URL-level metadata for your usage and observability — the page content itself is never persisted. That's a product-wide default, not a setting.

Can I run this on every page automatically?

Yes — the same audit is a single API call. Once you've signed up, score a whole sitemap in a loop, wire it into CI to catch regressions, or schedule it. The web tool here is the front door to the API.

Score your whole site, free.

1,000 credits, one bearer token. Audit one page or loop the audit over your entire sitemap.